Pigeon-Talk  

Go Back   Pigeon-Talk > Pigeons & People > Wild "Feral" Pigeons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 14th November 2005, 08:39 PM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

Peta Action Alert Goop On Building In Calif


I was going through PETA'S website and came across this, the photos on there are three pigeons died and stuck to the roof , it is horrible. We need to put a end to this sick practice of bird control... now.

Please write this property management company it only takes a few words of all the wisdom I know you all have and send it to the address below. Thanks for helping.

Andi

Urgent: Birds Still Writhing, Dying on Sticky Surfaces in Coastal California!

PETA has learned that Lilly Property Management is using a sticky glue-like substance to kill birds on a residential building in Mar Vista, California. Images of birds who reportedly have fallen prey to these cruel products at this location can be viewed here. Products such as TangleFoot, while advertised as "deterrents," actually end up causing birds to suffer slow, agonizing deaths when they land upon them.

It can take days for trapped animals to die from starvation and dehydration, and the glue can rip patches of skin and feathers from the animals' bodies as they struggle to escape. These sticky "repellents" can also cause "nontarget" animals who accidentally land on them to suffer and die as well. (Directly or indirectly harming any protected bird is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and is punishable by a $15,000 fine per violation.)

In addition to being cruel, sticky "repellents," poisons, and other lethal methods will not control animal populations. The only long-term way to control bird populations is to modify the habitat so that the area is unattractive or inaccessible to the animals. PETA has attempted to provide Property Supervisor Reid Slovis with humane alternatives to this hideous glue, but our requests have been met with silence. We have sent Mr. Slovis detailed information on proven, humane bird-exclusion methods, including PETA's new report "Permanent and Humane Pigeon-Control Solutions" and the factsheet "Street Pigeons: War Heroes, Devoted Parents, Clever Learners," but again, all to no apparent avail, and now we desperately need your help.

It is vital that Mr. Slovis assure you that his properties will forgo the use of Tanglefoot and other sticky repellents now and in the future and that he will instead rely on effective, humane methods that everyone can live with, including the birds.

Be nice, or it will work against this campaign:

Reid Slovis, Property Supervisor
Lilly Property Management
4727 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
323-930-2671
323-937-7051 (fax)

mw 8233
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15th November 2005, 06:51 AM
WhiteWingsCa WhiteWingsCa is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,107
re: breaking the "traps" - please be careful here. You are damaging property that belongs to someone else - it's just a matter of time before you are identified, and fined for doing so.

re: removing the "goop" -- "Goo Gone" would likely work - and it's safe (the soap form -- "15. My dog got into some tar. Can I use Goo Gone on his fur?

While we do not officially recommend Goo Gone, we are aware of its use to remove ink and tar from pets and by veterinarians to de-oil birds. Be careful with the animal's eyes, and wash it off thoroughly afterwards. And remember, Goo Gone Hand Soap is perfect for our furry friends."
-
http://www.magicamerican.com/faq.shtml

http://www.magicamerican.com/googone.shtml
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15th November 2005, 10:50 AM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

As far as the traps being damaged


my friend doesn't actually break them, he somehow disengages the springs that are very well fixable at no cost that way while the trap is up on the roof for a month until the pesty dude comes for his birds (he has no birds) simply.....

thanks
Andi

As for using googone on a animal (that stuff is nasty and I would never put that on anything alive.)

Last edited by andinla; 15th November 2005 at 10:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15th November 2005, 11:10 AM
Maggie-NC's Avatar
Maggie-NC Maggie-NC is offline
Guardian Angel
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,855
I'm not familiar with goo-gone soap but I do have the regular kind and it warns to use in a well ventilated area. I personally will stick to Dawn for the time being, but if the soap proves to be effective by wildlife people I will keep an open mind. Anything, just anything, that can help remove this horrible stuff, as long as it does not hurt the bird more, may be worth a try.

Maggie
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 16th November 2005, 03:24 AM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

RESPONSE LETTER FROM NPMA (national pest control message board)


I posted this question to the national pest control assocation on a message board (his response on the goop gel is not true, this is crazy if they do not realize what their people are using. And what it is doing to wild life.


what is the law on removal of pest control who have traps placed on commerical buildings left for a month that trap pigeons what are they allowed to do to them? use them for shooting targets, are they allowed to kill them themselves? also what is the law on goop gel that doesn't only kill pigeons but protected birds aswell? I think this is a horrible application the birds suffer and die a horrible death it needs to be out lawed and stopped please e-mail back I wait for your response. '
Thank you
Becka Dahm
I am in CA


Re: bird control methods
Posted By NPMA Staff on 11/15/2005 at 3:52 PM

Pigeons are often very serious pests, and they pose very significant human health threats by harboring and spreading pathogens, including histoplasmosis and coccidiomycoses, just to name a couple. They also frequently deface buildings and damage ventilation systems and routinely harbor mites which also readily bite humans (and pets). Controlling such pathogen reservoirs and pests is often VERY necessary, not just desirable. Regarding any questions about the legality of the particular actions you mention, I would have to actually see the details at the places where you report those actions to be occurring, and find out some additional facts to have any basis for any suggestions of any kind. There is a state government agency in each state which regulates commercial pest management companies, their employees' certifications, and business licenses. The exact title and organizational placement of such an agency can vary for different states. You would have to contact that agency and get their interpretation of those detailed situations and actions in question. I am certain that no properly licensed Pest Managemant company, nor any of its properly certified employees would do such things as you suggest (e.g., regarding using any captured bird as a "target," for anything). (Of course, private citizens might not abide by those same legal, ethical or practical guidlines.) If a professional Pest Management company's technicians are legally allowed to dispose of such captured pests, they would certainly use the most 'humane' method approved for that purpose. Some states have Health, or Wildlife, laws which actually require the euthanization of particular species of such vermin (but I do NOT think that is true of California). Laws can be changed (and often are) over time, and sometimes such changes can occur fairly suddenly. I (and the NPMA) are frequently not nearly as 'current' on your own state's laws as those state regulators mentioned earlier would be. Regarding your second concern, there is currently NO properly labeled (i.e., U.S. "EPA Registered") product available in the U.S. which is a surface "gel" with ANY significant toxic action. That "goop" (to use your term) literally does NOT kill the pigeons, but only makes them uncomfortable enough that they move away from that resting or loafing site (perch). Such products act only as a "sticky" deterant to the pigeons' standing on the sites to which it has been applied. Those gels are definitely NOT strong enough in their adhesive action to prevent a pigeon (or most other birds) from simply walking away. If the product label of those gels is followed, then those same exact sites would, in fact, seldom even be visited by non-target species (let alone any "protected" species). It is not clear to me whether or not you are claiming to have directly observed any birds dying in such an actual situation, or maybe you are only conjecturing about a "potential" scenario which has not been supported by such observations. I will suggest that you may wish to contact that state regulatory agency for their interpretations.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 16th November 2005, 05:18 AM
WhiteWingsCa WhiteWingsCa is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,107
What a load of crap.

Mites/lice on pigeons are NOT transmittable to humans. If they were - my whole family would be crawling with them. After vaccinating and powdering the birds for lice, I've often had the little bugs crawling on ME! While the thought of them is uncomfortable - I know that they can't live anywhere but on the birds.

Pigeons do NOT pose "significant human health threats" - if they did, everyone with pigeons would be sick. I do understand that in cases where a building attic is swarming with pigeons, and never cleaned, then issues can arise - but this is rare.

Just another example of how big companies twist things around in order to frighten the general public, and then cash in on that fear.....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16th November 2005, 06:51 AM
feralpigeon's Avatar
feralpigeon feralpigeon is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 6,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by andinla

Those gels are definitely NOT strong enough in their adhesive action to prevent a pigeon (or most other birds) from simply walking away. If the product label of those gels is followed, then those same exact sites would, in fact, seldom even be visited by non-target species (let alone any "protected" species).
The man I spoke with had actually seen pigeons trapped on the glue, and trying to self mutilate so that they could leave the stuck toes behind. Maybe the product becomes stickier over time when exposed to air and some of the moisture evaporates. Still, I'm having a hard time believing that the quote above is a truthful one. If a pigeon can get stuck, what about the smaller birds.

fp
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16th November 2005, 07:40 AM
Maggie-NC's Avatar
Maggie-NC Maggie-NC is offline
Guardian Angel
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,855
This crap makes me so mad I could spit! It is the same old garbage they spew out every time they are confronted.

If the public could see the tops of roofs with this crap on it and see what small birds look like after they are stuck, there would be an outcry. I personally have not seen a pigeon with the goop on it but you can go back and look at the pictures I posted to see what it did to that small finch which is a protected species, and believe if it is applied thickly enough it could entangle a pigeon who could not pull loose. The crap gets on feathers even if they can pull loose and they probably are not able to fly and fend for themselves. Everything they touch, dirt, trash, anything would stick to them, and what happens to their tongues and mouth and inside their body when they try to preen the crap off.

Maggie
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16th November 2005, 10:09 AM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

Get A Load Of This Pest Guys New Message Re:pigeons


I WROTE THE NATIONAL PEST MANAGEMENT MESSAGE BOARD AGAIN RE:GEL GLUE AND PIGEON DIEASES ETC., I ALSO TOLD HIM TO CHECK OUT A PICTURE OF BIRDS IN THE GEL GLUE ON TOP OF A BUILDING, HE SUGGESTED THE PHOTO WAS REDONE IN SOME WAY TO MAKE IT LOOK BAD THAT'S WHAT PETA DOES (I know the photo is not a redone photo and also know it is a actually photo because my friend was there trying to save these birds. This guys reply is very long and it gets interesting towards the end regarding pigeons being war heros.

Re: bird control
Posted By NPMA Staff on 11/17/2005 at 4:40 PM

Because of your sincerity (regardless of the misinformation you have acquired on several aspects of this topic), I will try one more time to offer you some verifiable factual information on several details in your two messages. Obviously, whether or not you believe anything I offer here is your choice. First, I had no intention of offending you, and I sincerely applaud your work to rescue any injured or struggling animals (of any kind). But you may be placing far too much undeserved blame on any given Pest Management technicians or companies. I have no way to know exactly what you saw, but applying a bird-repellent gel to a whole roof surface would be VERY time-consuming and would require a tremendous amount of the gel product. The combined cost of that much labor and gel product would have made such an application to even a small house

Last edited by andinla; 18th November 2005 at 03:05 AM. Reason: HAD TO
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18th November 2005, 03:06 AM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

Continued From Pest Message Board


small house’s roof much too expensive for most homeowners, or even most business owners, to be willing to pay for. Certainly, even the most careful person may make mistakes, but NO professional pest management company would be as bad regarding this issue as you seem to think they all are. Such companies are in business to earn a profit, but most of them get far more income from inspections, surveillance, and pest-proofing than from any lethal actions or chemical applications of any kind. It is a fact that laymen surprisingly often commit terrible acts of cruelty to animals (including birds). It would be easy to blame any legitimate, properly licensed Pest Management company working at or near any given site for those acts. Unless you actually KNOW the specific background, sources, and circumstances of any given animal's problem(s) by direct observation or irrefutable physical evidence, you could not possibly be SURE of the accuracy of your accusations. PETA (and certain other extreme groups) have definitely been known to use modified images, and many other tricks, however and whenever it suited their current purposes. You should at least consider the possibility that they may have created and photographed the scenes shown on their web site themselves (that group has done many worse things), or they may have used a re-touched image of some long past events specifically to offend and inflame anyone who may view it. Not many years ago, most people in the U.S. were much more aware of, and much closer to, the literally savage side of Nature; and they were much less shocked by scenes which would now routinely become headline features in regional or local newspapers. Something “natural” does NOT mean something less brutal or more benign. Nature is NOT even usually benevolent, as such idealistic animated Disney™ films as Bambi have portrayed it. Living beings (any species) survive because they have become adapted to do so over time (in some cases, over very long periods) in their “usual” effective individual environments. PETA representatives have repeatedly and openly stated that a rat (apparently ANY rat) is equivalent in importance to a child (apparently ANY child). Do you believe all the made-up images you see in horror, or many other, films? And would you want someone directing or leading your actions (and possibly even your thoughts ?) who would sacrifice your child without any remorse at all if it meant "saving" two (or more) rats? I actually do know quite a lot about what I (and you) have been writing about. Your information (from PETA, or elsewhere) is at least seriously distorted, and, in some important details, just plain incorrect!! My sources of information have included the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), certain publications of the World Health Organization (WHO), and several well recognized published Medical and basic Scientific references and college texts; and even a significant number of my own direct personal observations. There is clear, overwhelming evidence, of undeniable factuality, that pigeons are, and have long been independently shown to be, reservoir hosts, and carriers, of the diseases and secondary pests I had briefly mentioned before (and more). I have a close personal friend who spent 8 months in a hospital bed several years ago, and he nearly died, due specifically to Histoplasmosis (with NO other complicating factors); so don’t even try to tell me that blatant lie (from the PETA web site, or from any other source) about Histoplasmosis causing only a “mild cold” in humans. Your information about Toxoplasmosis is wrong, too. Domestic cats (and related species) are, again undeniably, the main reservoirs of that disease (actually they are the "definitive hosts" of that parasitic micro-organism), and there is little or NO direct association with food, cooked or otherwise. I will repeat, pigeon control is very often quite necessary, even though their effective control does NOT have to be lethal. Changing the local situation and eliminating or greatly reducing availability of food so the birds are not (or are much less) attracted to any given pest problem site; and changing the physical nature of the surfaces where they like to roost or build nests are good long-term control strategies. Unfortunately, such measures are sometimes much too costly for the owner or manager of the building or property in question to afford. Also unfortunately, you clearly have a closed mind on these issues and nothing I or anyone else (outside the PETA camp) could possibly say or write would reach you. That is too bad, for you and millions of other people, because it prevents you (and others like you) from even acknowledging the VERY serious damage to medical research (among other things) which that organization (PETA) has done, and still openly continues to do. They are among the more obvious of the extreme organizations which the TV program "60 Minutes," and others, have recently openly labeled as "Eco-terrorists" and which are an obvious and serious threat as "domestic terrorist" groups. Regarding a pigeon ever having saved the life of any of my ancestors, I seriously doubt that was even a possibility. I happen to be a fairly well informed student of military history, as well; and pigeons have simply NEVER had more than a minor or incidental impact on any military campaign, operation, or even a single battle. There have been a few multiply-cited incidents where they delivered some possibly helpful message(s), but those have never been essential to the winning of any given objective of any military significance. Instead, they have always been more of a fascinating diversion, as versus other already available, more effective, and more practical means of communication. Wars and battles have seldom "happened" to go where the pigeons were "lofted" or to include places to which they would normally return. Messenger (or “homing”) pigeons must be carried along, routinely cared for (requiring considerable time, expertise, effort, and other physical and financial resources), kept in good health, and appropriately ‘burdened’ at some critical time with some “message,” which they would then carry back ONLY to their own home loft. That would be a one-way trip, and they (and any message they carried) could NOT be sent to any other place. For these reasons, and a few more, pigeons have almost never been a tactically (nor strategically) practical method of message transmission in anything but a very static military situation.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 18th November 2005, 05:34 AM
Pigeonpal2002's Avatar
Pigeonpal2002 Pigeonpal2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 6,395
Hi Andi & All,

I hate to say it but the person you are corresponding with may have a point here. I think it's quite possible that many companies or individuals could be taking things into their own hands and setting the inhumane traps/poisons to save a buck or two. Now I'm not saying that this is right or any less important to the overall situation but perhaps not as many pest control companies are to blame for these acts of cruelty as we might think. This person certainly sounds like they aren't talking through a hole in their head.

Also, he mentioned a friend of his nearly dying from Histoplasmosis and I'm *assuming* it was related to pigeon droppings in his context. This disease is a fungal disease and it usually affects the lungs in people. Perhaps this person was already compromised in some way that it ended up having more severe consequences to him/her. Still, I don't think it's as common to get it from pigeon poop as he is saying. The fungus lives in the soil as well and you'd have to be around the dried poop a lot to get this disease. So in that regard, pigeons and their droppings aren't a likely source for most people.

Regarding his comments about pigeons helping in the war, I guess that is somewhat debatable and open to interpretation. I *believe* pigeons did a lot back then for the war efforts and certainly helped the allies gain an advantage.

Not to take the pest control's side by any means, but I think it's important to listen to what some of them might share and be open minded to get the facts so we are not all labled "nut jobs" or "Crazies". He/she brought up some valid points about PETA and some other organizations. I am tending to believe that the individuals of small companies or even larger ones are as equally responsible for the improper and cruel methods of pigeon control as the pest control companies themselves.

JMHO,

Last edited by Pigeonpal2002; 18th November 2005 at 06:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 19th January 2006, 09:01 PM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

10 starving pigeons


released to freedom last night. Trapped inside a one way entrance trap with no food left for them. Not protected from the elements such as rain. One was so weak it couldn't get the energy to fly off right away with the others. We were caught and told to leave or the police would be called. I am filing animal cruelty charges on the gas station and subcontractor who set up the trap.

Andi
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 19th January 2006, 10:11 PM
Anarrowescape's Avatar
Anarrowescape Anarrowescape is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Camp Pendleton CA
Age: 23
Posts: 507
andi wot you do for these birds amazes me is there a website where you can e-mail regarding these traps i can ask a website i go on to post it there to help the situation of harmful trappings and control methods
__________________
Semper Fidelis
USMC
Robert
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 19th January 2006, 10:37 PM
BrianNAmy's Avatar
BrianNAmy BrianNAmy is offline
Pigeon
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 129
Andi,

Go to the Urban Wildlife Society's web site. Contact the person there named Dave Roth (he's here in Phoenix). He rescues pigeons and campaigns for humane methods as well. The local and county govt's here have consulted with him many times about commercial pigeon control methods. He may be able to help give you some more info on dealing with them.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 20th January 2006, 10:10 PM
andinla's Avatar
andinla andinla is offline
Matriarch
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 728

Thank you


I was actually thinking of doing that
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
pest control, pet store, pigeon poop, wild bird, young pigeon


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 2000-2004 Pigeon-Life.net